Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Kasich et al
as 1:2018cv00357
Plaintiff:
Linda Goldenhar, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, Elizabeth Myer and others
Defendant:
Governor John R. Kasich, Secretary of State Jon A. Husted, Larry Obhof and others
In Re:
Warden John Morgan and Edward Gillespie
Intervenor:
Robert F Bodi, Franklin County Republican Party, Rep. Dave Joyce and others
Amicus Curiae:
Lake and Geauga County Boards of Commissioners
Petitioner:
Adam Kincaid, Republican National Committee, Thomas Whatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: SUBPOENAS SERVED ON EDWARD GILLESPIE AND JOHN MORGAN
as 1:2018mc00030
Petitioner:
Linda Goldenhar, Teresa Thobaben, League of Women Voters of Ohio and others
In Re:
SUBPOENAS SERVED ON EDWARD GILLESPIE AND JOHN MORGAN
Respondent:
Edward Gillespie and "John" Morgan
Tutstone v. Garner et al
as 1:2012cv02963
Plaintiff:
Eric Tutstone
Defendant:
Bruce Garner, John Morgan, Timothy Kolonick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morgan v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01537
Plaintiff:
John Morgan
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aaron v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2009cv02549
Defendant:
Visteon Corporation, Noble Grohe, Lacoya Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Marla J. Aaron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Hill-Morgan et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, et al.
as 1:2011dp21475
Plaintiff:
John Morgan and Donna Hill-Morgan
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson International , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson, Jr. v. Eleby et al
as 1:2007cv00815
Plaintiff:
Jacky Lee Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
William Eleby, "John" Morgan, Edward Voorhies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
