Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Lay v. Clerk of Court
as 1:2011cv02378
Plaintiff: John R. Lay
Defendant: Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. Legg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00291
Defendant: Custodian of Inmate Trust Fund, Benson E. Legg and The Clerk of the U.S. District Court
Plaintiff: John R. Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Lay v. John/Jane Doe
as 11-6780
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN R. LAY
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN/JANE DOE, Director Medical Department, JOHN/JANE DOE, Director Mental Health Department, JANE DOE, Psychologist and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01661
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6705
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01178
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lay v. Rodway et al
as 1:2011cv00414
Plaintiff: John R. Lay
Defendant: Ian Rodway, John T. Frey, Chad Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lay v. Rodway et al
as 7:2011cv00178
Defendant: Custodian of Records, Property and Evidence Section, Chad Ellis, John T. Frey and others
Plaintiff: John R. Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Lay v. Chad Elli
as 11-6446
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN R. LAY
Defendant - Appellee: CHAD ELLIS, Policeman, IAN RODWAY, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney and CUSTODIAN OF PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE UNIT
John Lay v. James Clinton
as 11-6404
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN R. LAY
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES P. CLINTON, ARTHUR M. WALLENSTEIN, J. L. JONES and others
Defendant: ISIAH LEGGETT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?