Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Illinois Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Hager et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff: Illinois Mutual Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Richard Kevin Hager, James Clifford Hager, Colby Hager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
USA v. Epperson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-40567
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: John Randall Epperson
John Futch v. Myron Batt
as 16-11562
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons
John Futch v. Cheron Nash We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-51222
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: CHERON NASH
Futch v. Nash
as 1:2016cv00935
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Cheron Y. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Futch v. Nash
as 1:2016cv00934
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Cheron Y. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Morrow, Jr. v. Tanya Morrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-40455
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN RANDALL MORROW, JR.
Defendant - Appellant: TANYA MORROW
John Futch v. Myron Batt
as 16-10267
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Big Spring
Futch v. Nash
as 1:2016cv00175
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Cheron Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Futch v. Cheron Nash, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-50147
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: CHERON NASH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Bastrop

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?