Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 7:2019cv00010
Respondent:
State of Washington, United States, U.S. Congress and others
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demos v. The United States et al
as 3:2018cv00278
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
The United States, State of Washington, U.S. Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Demos et al v. Alexis et al
as 1:2014cv00589
Defendant:
Aaron Alexis and Bass Pro Shops
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Alexis et al
as 1:2014cv00537
Defendant:
Aaron Alexis and Bass Pro Shops
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Danzig et al
as 1:2014cv00592
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. and Glenn Danzig
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00590
Defendant:
Frederick Banks, Keith Russell Judd, Amanda Levy and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis et al v. Danzig et al
as 1:2014cv00534
Defendant:
Austin Police Dept. and Glenn Danzig
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Putin et al
as 1:2014cv00535
Defendant:
Shamil Basayev, Aleksandr Kerensky, Tsar Nicholas LNU and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Roman Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
