Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Demos v. The United States of America et al
as 9:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
The United States of America and The State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. State of Vermont et al
as 5:2010cv00088
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Washington, State of, President of the United States, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demos v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv00479
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
USA and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00093
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brant v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
John Robert Brant
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Demos v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00167
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benhatzel v. Erie County Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2008cv06170
Plaintiff:
John Robert Benhatzel
Defendant:
Erie County Correctional Facility and Erie County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hoyt Livery Inc et al v. Cherival et al
as 3:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
Hoyt Livery Inc and Hoyt Limousine LLC
Defendant:
Jean R. Cherival and John Roberts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Baa v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv01197
Plaintiff:
Jerome Baa
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, John Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Banchon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv02135
Plaintiff:
Darwin Banchon
Defendant:
City of New York, Edgar Bragg, Richard Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
