Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Cox et al v. Prince Georges County, Maryland et al
as 8:2014cv03408
Plaintiff:
Donnell David Cox, Jr, Mercedes T. Cox, Shanell Cox and others
Defendant:
Prince Georges County, Maryland, John S. Farrell, Prince George's Coutny Police Detective B.E.Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farrell et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2009cv10555
Plaintiff:
John S. Farrell and Janet Farrell
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Mabel Jones v. Prince George's County, Maryla
as 08-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MABEL S. JONES, individually and as the next best friend and personal representative of the estate of Prince Carmen Jones, Sr.
Intervenor/Plaintiff - None:
CANDACE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and CARLTON B. JONES, Officer, Prince George's County Police Department in both his official and individual capacities
Defendant - None:
ALEXANDRE BAILEY and JOHN S. FARRELL
Movant - None:
INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION, ROBERT F. HORAN, J. THOMAS MANGER and others
Jones, Mabel S. v. Prince George Cty, et al
as 02-7104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Mabel S. Jones, Individually, as the next best friend of, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Prince Carmen Jones, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Prince George's County, Maryland, John S. Farrell, Chief of Police, Prince George's County Police Department in both his official and individual capacities, Carlton B. Jones, Officer, Prince George's County Police Department in both his official and individual capacities and others
Terminated Party:
Robert F. Horan, Commonwealth's Attorney for Fairfax County and J. Thomas Manger
Movant - Appellant:
Prince Carmen Jones, Sr., individually and as co-legal custodian of Nina Amayye Eden Chi Jones, a minor and Candace Jackson, mother and next friend, and individually and as co-legal custodian of Nina Amayee Eden Chi Jones (Nina Jones), a minor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
