Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. Jindal et al
as 3:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal and John Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Haynes v. LA Dept of Public Sfty & Corr, et al
as 16-30235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary, Individual and Official Capacity, BURL CAIN, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Savoy v. Davis et al
as 3:2014cv00700
Defendant:
Daniel Davis, Scott Kennedy, John Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Savoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savoy v. Davis et al
as 3:2014cv00553
Defendant:
Daniel Davis, Scott Kennedy, John Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Savoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Leblanc
as 3:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
Derrick Bailey
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Robert Butler, N. Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Stead et al
as 3:2014cv00212
Defendant:
D. Adams, John Doe, John Sander and others
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hooker et al
as 3:2013cv00508
Defendant:
Unknown First Name Adams, Joseph Hooker and John Sanders
Plaintiff:
Herbert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Sanders et al
as 3:2013cv00305
Defendant:
Unknown Adams and John Sanders
Plaintiff:
Calvin Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Sanders et al
as 3:2013cv00282
Plaintiff:
Charlie Ball
Defendant:
Kevin Norman, Bryson Robinson, John Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 3:2013cv00097
Defendant:
Mason Hunter and John Sanders
Plaintiff:
Ronald Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
