Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schmitz et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00780
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Sharon Schmitz and John Schmitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coker v. Select Energy Services, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coker
Defendant:
Select Energy Services, LLC and John Schmitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Schmitz et al v. Bethune-Cookman University, Inc.
as 6:2014cv02088
Plaintiff:
John Schmitz and Ryan Kobbe
Defendant:
Bethune-Cookman University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Isaac Miller v. Steven Schmitz, et al
as 14-15522
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ISAAC MILLER
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN JOHN SCHMITZ, Hanford Police Officer and CITY OF HANFORD, California
Isaac Miller v. Steven Schmitz, et al
as 14-15519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN JOHN SCHMITZ, Hanford Police Officer and CITY OF HANFORD, California
Kluppelberg v. Burge et al
as 1:2013cv03963
Plaintiff:
James Kluppelberg
Defendant:
Jon Burge, Leonard Rolston, John Schmitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Schmitz et al
as 1:2012at00051
Defendant:
Steven John Schmitz, Hanford City and Ron Silva
Plaintiff:
Isaac Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Schmitz et al
as 1:2012cv00137
Defendant:
Steven John Schmitz , Ronald Silva and City of Hanford
Plaintiff:
Isaac Miller
Counter_claimant:
Ronald Silva
Counter_defendant:
Isaac Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02920
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
