Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THE ESTATE OF FREDDY BAEZ JR. v.CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv05653
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, JOHN SCOTT THOMSON and CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #'S 1-4
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF FREDDY BAEZ JR. and VERONICA CABRERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MACKLIN v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv07641
Plaintiff:
MALIKY MACKLIN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN , CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN SCOTT THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ella Baker, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-1521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLA BAKER, individually and as guardian ad litem for R.B. and T.B. and BENJAMIN FRYE
Plaintiff:
R. B. and T. B.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CITY OF CAMDEN and POLICE CHIEF JOHN SCOTT THOMPSON
DICKERSON v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv06905
Plaintiff:
DARREN A. DICKERSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NIGEL SHOCKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. NATIONAL TENANT NETWORK, INC.
as 2:2014cv05792
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT
Defendant:
LCIJ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
NORMAN v. HADDON TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2014cv06034
Plaintiff:
JUANITA NORMAN
Defendant:
HADDON TOWNSHIP, MARK CAVALLO, BOROUGH OF OAKLYN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INGRAM v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv05519
Plaintiff:
XAVIER INGRAM
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEREMY MERCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
