Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Polk et al v. City of Port Lavaca et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Dolores Polk and Daniel Polk
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, John Smith Officer # 1, John Smith Officer # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Marathon Oil Company et al
as 4:2023cv01976
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Marathon Oil Company and Stim-Tech, Inc.
Infante v. Low et al
as 7:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Saints Infante
Defendant:
Justin W. Low, B.J. Brown, Don R. Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 7:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
District Attorney John Smith and John Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2022cv03696
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
Corderral John Smith
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Jimmy Smith, Kevin Schiwart, Jason Scholl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron et al v. KEL Logistics Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cameron and Kristeena Austin
Defendant:
KEL Logistics Inc., John and Rose, LLC, First Class Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2021cv00354
Petitioner:
John Smith
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Lopez v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Judge John Smith, District Attorney John Smith and Sheriff Mike Griffis
Plaintiff:
Albert A Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
