Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mr G's Ice-cream & Grill et al v. Hewitt et al
as 4:2012cv02076
Plaintiff:
Mr G's Ice-cream & Grill , Felix Serra and Deborah Serra
Defendant:
Wayne Hewitt , C Porter , R Arwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bailey v. North Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2010cv01656
Plaintiff:
William H Bailey, Jr
Defendant:
John Smithson , Steven Thomas , Nicole Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joyce Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach
as 09-1993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE E. ROWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, JOEL DAVIS, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach, KEVIN BLAYTON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach and others
Joyce Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach
as 09-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE E. ROWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, JOEL DAVIS, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach, KEVIN BLAYTON, Individually and in his capacity as employee of the City of North Myrtle Beach and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rowley v. North Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2007cv01636
Defendant:
City Of North Myrtle Beach, Douglas Maddock, Joel Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Joyce E Rowley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
