Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016hc02256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
In Re: Direxion Shares ETF Tru
as 12-725
Plaintiff:
Evan Stoopler, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Thomas C. Longman, Michael Salach, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
Barton Boothe
Defendant - Appellee:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Daniel O'Neill, Daniel J. Byrne and others
Lee v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2010cv01273
Plaintiff:
William Lee
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust , Daniel O. O'Neil , Todd Kellerman and others
Movant:
Howard Schwack
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Schwack v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Howard Schwack, Howard Schwack and Howard Schwack
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Daniel O'Neill, Todd Kellerman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Longman et al v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2009cv08459
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Longman and Thomas C. Longman
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Daniel D. O'Neil, Todd Kellerman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Pfeiffer et al v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2009cv08375
Plaintiff:
Milton Pfeiffer, Milton Pfeiffer, Milton Pfeiffer and others
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Daniel O'Neill, Todd Kellerman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Stoopler v. Direxion Shares ETF Trust et al
as 1:2009cv08011
Plaintiff:
Evan Stoopler
Defendant:
Direxion Shares ETF Trust, Daniel O'Neill, Todd Kellerman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
