Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Petzold v. Rostollan et al
as 5:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Petzold
Defendant:
Mike Rostollan, Christopher Wooding and John Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Molony v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02747
Plaintiff:
John William Molony, III
Defendant:
DePuy Inc and Johnson and Johnson Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardt v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00789
Petitioner:
John William Hardt
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardt v. Stephens
as 5:2015cv00658
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
John William Hardt
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adame et al v. McLane
as 4:2015cv02175
Plaintiff:
Robert Adame, Steven Alvarez, Paul Ayala and others
Defendant:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCollor v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00032
Petitioner:
John William McCollor
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCollor v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2015cv01655
Petitioner:
John William McCollor
Defendant:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglass et al v. Beakley
as 5:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Timothy K Douglass , Scott P Douglass , Samuel K Douglass and others
Defendant:
John William Beakley, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Douglass et al v. Beakley et al
as 7:2012mc00022
Defendant:
BGA Enterprises, Inc., Amy Janise Beakley, David Janson Beakley and others
Receiver:
Fernando M Bustos
Plaintiff:
Mark N Douglass, Samuel K Douglass, Scott P Douglass and others
Interested Party:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Douglass et al v. Beakley et al
as 6:2012mc00005
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. Douglass, Scott P. Douglass, Samuel K. Douglass and others
Receiver:
Fernando M. Bustos
Defendant:
John William Beakley, Mary Adams Beakley, Meghan Beakley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
