Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Smith-Bey v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01336
Petitioner:
Charles A. Smith-Bey
Respondent:
John Wolfe, Amy J. Bragunier and Rex W. Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sorensen v. Doe et al
as 8:2015cv01198
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sorensen
Defendant:
John Doe, John Hammond, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molin v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01111
Petitioner:
Steven F. Molin
Respondent:
John Wolfe and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atah El v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00948
Petitioner:
Sakitah Selmah Atah El
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe, Warden Margaret Chippendale and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith-Bey v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00764
Petitioner:
Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maurice El v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00763
Petitioner:
Lamont Maurice El
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe, Warden Margaret Chippendale and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sloan v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
John Wolfe, Smith, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayland Farm Enterprises, LLC v. Talbot County, Maryland et al
as 1:2014cv03412
Plaintiff:
Clayland Farm Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Talbot County, Maryland , Talbot County Planning & Zoning Commission , Talbot County Department of Public Works Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
