Cases filed in District of Columbia
GIONET v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff: Mrs. Susanne Gionet and SUSANNE GIONET
Not Classified By Court: SUSAN E. LOFGREN
Defendant: NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, Hon. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ADAM SCHIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HOMOL et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00527
Plaintiff: JESSICA HOMOL, DILLON PAUL HOMOL and HANNA HOMOL
Not Classified By Court: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant: NANCY PELOSI, BERNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
GORKA v. THOMPSON, et al.,
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff: SEBASTIAN GORKA
Defendant: BENNIE G. THOMPSON, JOHN WOOD, TIMOTHY J. HEAPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
MEGGS et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00005
Plaintiff: CONNIE MEGGS and KELLY MEGGS
Not Classified By Court: NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L, CHENEY and others
Defendant: ELIZABETH L. CHENEY, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EASTMAN v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2021cv03273
Plaintiff: JOHN C. EASTMAN
Defendant: VERIZON, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, John wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WISCONSIN VOTERS ALLIANCE et al v. PENCE et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03791
Plaintiff: BRENDA SAVAGE, RICHARD W KUCKSDORF, DEBI HAAS and others
Defendant: BUTCH MILLER, U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, LEE CHATFIELD and others
Respondent: Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Type: Civil Rights Voting
WOOD v. MAYBUS
as 1:2016cv01026
Defendant: RAY MAYBUS
Plaintiff: II JOHN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?