Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Potocnik v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
Brian Potocnik
Defendant:
Anoka County, Dakota County , Hennepin County and others
Sapp et al v. Hunt et al
as 0:2013cv00286
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Sapp , Jennifer Lewis , Marie Stodolka and others
Defendant:
John Hunt, Keith Parker, Robert Maki and others
Whigham et al v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources et al
as 0:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Thomas Whigham , Richard Whigham , Debbra Flicker and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources , Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Tom Landwehr and others
Smythe v. Onamia, City of et al
as 0:2012cv03149
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gordon Smythe
Defendant:
Onamia, City of , Robert L. Matzke , Crow Wing County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Doe(s) et al
as 0:2012cv01258
Plaintiff:
Leah Anderson
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe(s) and Minneapolis, The City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasmusson v. Bloomington, City of et al
as 0:2012cv00632
Plaintiff:
Anne Marie Rasmusson
Defendant:
Bloomington, City of , Burnsville, City of , Cottage Grove, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis et al v. Minneapolis, City of et al
as 0:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis and Harriet Ellis
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cox v. Dakota County et al
as 0:2011cv02615
Plaintiff:
Jason Jalony Cox
Defendant:
Dakota County and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Anderson et al
as 0:2011cv02143
Plaintiff:
Quera Pruitt
Defendant:
Karsten Anderson, Beth Borgen, Red Wing Public Schools, ISD #256 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smithrud v. St. Paul, City of et al
as 0:2010cv04452
Plaintiff:
LeRoy Smithrud
Defendant:
St. Paul, City of and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
