Cases 91 - 100 of 120
BRIDGES v. OUELLETTE et al
as 2:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIDGES
Defendant:
MAURICE OUELLETTE, CAPTAIN KORTES, SGT DAIGNAULT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Briggs et al
as 3:2013cv30019
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Doe and Jorden Louis Doe
Defendant:
Amy Briggs, Barbara Cece, Lance LaPointe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Noone v. Palmer, Town of et al
as 3:2012cv30206
Plaintiff:
Spud Noone
Defendant:
Palmer, Town of, Paul Nowicki, Peter A Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Piccone v. Dickenson et al
as 3:2012cv30127
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Dickenson, Hein, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pembroke Public Schools v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv10971
Plaintiff:
Pembroke Public Schools
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe and Massachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Brown v. Massachusetts, Commonwealth of et al
as 1:2012cv10791
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown
Defendant:
Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, Department of Correction for the State of Massachusetts, Luis Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROLLINS v. HACKET et al
as 2:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
LARRY DEAN ROLLINS
Defendant:
HACKET, LINDA WENTWORTH, BAILY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLIN v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Prime PPV, Inc. v. Henriquez et al
as 3:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
Prime PPV, Inc.
Defendant:
Ramley Henriquez, Conjugal Partnership Henriquez - Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
