Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Burley v. FBOP et al
as 6:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Martin Burley
Defendant:
FBOP, C. Eichenlaub, Richard Ives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders et al v. Bottom et al
as 5:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
B.R.S. , H.M.J.S. and Rebecca Marie Lindsey
Defendant:
Don Bottom , Rick Rowlette , Correctcare - Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 6:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Boggs et al
as 0:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Fleming Logan, Jr.
Defendant:
R.W. Boggs, Carter County, KY and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vines-Carter v. Mt. Carmel Hospital et al
as 5:2014cv00274
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Vines-Carter
Defendant:
Mt. Carmel Hospital, Mt. Carmel West Hospital, Riverside Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spivey v. Farley et al
as 7:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Mandriez Ramon Spivey
Defendant:
Farley, Norris Synder, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. USA et al
as 6:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Stephen Desmund Peterson
Defendant:
USA, USP-Victorville Medical Staff, USP-McCreary Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Neel v. Bullitt County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2014cv00415
Plaintiff:
Franklin Neel
Defendant:
Bullitt County, Kentucky , Martha Knox , Capisano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Smith et al
as 0:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Clark
Defendant:
Matt Smith and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. City of Morganfield, Kentucky et al
as 4:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rashad Smith
Defendant:
City of Morganfield, Kentucky, Morganfield Police Department, John W. Shofner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
