Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Heaven v. Cauwenberghs, et al
as 3:2022cv00779
Plaintiff:
Terrence Heaven
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, D. Cauwenberghs, T. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00763
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hare v. Ranjie et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Hare
Defendant:
Ranjie and John and Jane Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Franklin v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Franklin
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, John or Jane Doe I, John or Jane Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bessent v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Rashad-Devon Bessent
Defendant:
Joseph Roinette Biden, Jr., Charles Rettig, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Franklin v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Franklin
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Jack Campbell, C Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peacock v. Alvarez-Sowles et al
as 8:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Randall Laurel Peacock
Defendant:
Nikki Alvarez-Sowles, David M. Caples, Deanna Giannini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon v. Johnson et al
as 8:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Johana Colon
Defendant:
Kevin G. Johnson, Dale L. Hersey, Nathan S. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
