Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Marvin Montgomery, et al v. H.E. Butt Grocery Company, et al
as 5:2019cv01063
Plaintiff:
Marvin Montgomery and Francisco Meza
Defendant:
H-E-B Savings & Retirement Plan Investment & Administration Committee, H.E. Butt Grocery Company and John and Jane Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Miller et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2019cv00700
Plaintiff:
America's Party of Texas, Libertarian Party of Texas, Constitution Party of Texas and others
Defendant:
Jose A. Esparza and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myart v. City of San Antonio, et al
as 5:2019cv00702
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Employees of John Does Security Company, Baptist Hospital System and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Myart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Loya-Ruiz v. Fang et al
as 3:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Boyonet Transport, Inc., Cheng Fang, Bingye Chen and others
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Loya-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scott v. Doe
as 1:2018cv00710
Plaintiff:
David Greg Scott
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lopez v. Zwicke et al
as 5:2017cv01044
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Costillajas, Female Grievance Office, Robert Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
David Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
