Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Suleman v. Shineski et al
as 5:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jawal Suleman
Defendant:
Erik K Shineski , Elizabeth Goolsby , United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
McKoy v. Batten et al
as 7:2010cv00127
Defendant:
Christopher Batten , Guy Best , Western Surety Company and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy McKoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McKoy v. Batten et al
as 5:2010ct03113
Defendant:
Christopher Batten , Guy Best , Western Surety Company and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy McKoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Renee v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 7:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Denise Renee
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., Vikram Pandit, First NLC Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Supler v. RGS FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Supler
Defendant:
RGS FINANCIAL, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Supler v. FIRST REVENUE ASSURANCE, LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Supler
Defendant:
FIRST REVENUE ASSURANCE, LLC and JOHN AND JANE DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Christian Louboutin, S. A. et al v. Chantarungsri et al
as 5:2009cv00539
Plaintiff:
Christian Louboutin, S. A., Christian Louboutin, S. A., Christian Louboutin, S. A. and others
Defendant:
Suebsak Chantarungsri, Suebsak Chantarungsri, Suebsak Chantarungsri and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Mercer v. Bank One, NA et al
as 5:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
Nadine Mercer
Defendant:
Bank One, NA, Bank of New York, as Trustee on behalf of the registered certificateholders of GSAMP Trust-2004-SEA2, Grady I. Ingle or Elizabeth B. Ells, Shapiro & Ingle L.L.P., as Substitute Trustee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
