Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Bilewicz v. FMR LLC et al
as 1:2013cv10636
Plaintiff:
Lori Bilewicz
Defendant:
FMR LLC, FMR LLC Investment Committee and John and Jane Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Doe et al v. Briggs et al
as 3:2013cv30019
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Doe and Jorden Louis Doe
Defendant:
Amy Briggs, Barbara Cece, Lance LaPointe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Noone v. Palmer, Town of et al
as 3:2012cv30206
Plaintiff:
Spud Noone
Defendant:
Palmer, Town of, Paul Nowicki, Peter A Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Piccone v. Dickenson et al
as 3:2012cv30127
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Dickenson, Hein, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pembroke Public Schools v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv10971
Plaintiff:
Pembroke Public Schools
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe and Massachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Brown v. Massachusetts, Commonwealth of et al
as 1:2012cv10791
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown
Defendant:
Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, Department of Correction for the State of Massachusetts, Luis Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monaghan v. Dow et al
as 1:2011cv12205
Plaintiff:
Robert E Monaghan
Defendant:
Bruce Dow, MD, Rick Gregg and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cellco Partnership v. System Council T-6 et al
as 1:2011cv11436
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership
Defendant:
System Council T-6 , Local 2222 IBEW , Local 2321 IBEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wattleton v. Doe
as 4:2010cv40175
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
