Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Heard v. Danforth et al
as 7:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
WILLIAM DANFORTH, Jose Morales, Johnny Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Day, Jr. v. Hilton Hall, et al
as 11-15507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER C. DAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HILTON HALL, JOHNNY SIKES, BRUCE CHAPMAN and others
Heard v. Pannell et al
as 1:2011cv04021
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Charles A. Pannell, Jr., E. Clayton Scofield, III, B. Avant Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Goodman v. Commissioner, Georgia Departme, et al
as 11-11752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY GOODMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HUGH SMITH, Warden of the Georgia State Prison, RONALD WHITAKER, Deputy Warden for Care and Treatment of the Augusta State Medical Prison and others
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams-Wilborn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jackie Adams-Wilborn
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Johnny Sikes, Hilton Hall and others
Brown v. Garner et al
as 6:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Brown
Defendant:
Wayne Garner and Johnny Sikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. Owens et al
as 4:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Derrick Schofield, Harris Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Hall v. Donald et al
as 6:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Steve Upton, Steve Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
