Cases 11 - 20 of 8,425
Doe v. City and County of San Francisco
as 3:2024cv02872
Plaintiff:
John CJ Doe
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stringer
as 3:2024mc80106
Plaintiff:
John Eric Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Carroll v. Velarde et al
as 5:2024cv02782
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Latrice Carroll
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Velarde, Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Judge John C. Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Redwood Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Deaudry Eugene Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Redwood Credit Union, Kim Odeh, Nguyen Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Buchanan v. Becker et al
as 5:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Buchanan
Defendant:
Gregory W. Becker, Daniel J. Beck, Karen Hon and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kitchens v. Whisenhunt et al
as 5:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Neil G. Kitchens
Defendant:
Teresa Kay Whisenhunt, Phillip Dwight Whisenhunt, Rhonda Burks Joodi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
