Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv01982
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TABB v. FISHER et al
as 2:2011cv01243
Petitioner:
BENNIE M. TABB
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carlton Bullock v. William Dreibelbis, et al
as 11-3518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLTON L. BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM DREIBELBIS, Healthcare Administrator, RONALD A. LONG, Director of Health Care Services, JON D. FISHER, Superintendent of Smithfield and others
SMITH v. FISHER
as 2:2011cv05609
Petitioner:
I-KIEM SMITH
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitney v. Varner et al
as 3:2011cv01504
Plaintiff:
Charles Whitney
Defendant:
Dorina Varner, Jon D. Fisher, Lisa Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Nyamwange v. Jon Fisher, et al
as 11-3006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD NYAMWANGE
Defendant - Appellee:
JON D. FISHER, Superintendent, Smithfield State Correctional Institute, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and MONROE CTY DA
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 3:2011cv01034
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Jon D. Fisher, R.S. Hannah, Lisa Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FISHER
as 2:2011cv03281
Petitioner:
STEPHEN JONES
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. FISHER et al
as 1:2011cv00104
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALAN CAMPBELL
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STANLEY v. FISHER et al
as 5:2011cv03040
Petitioner:
JAMES STANLEY
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
