Cases 61 - 70 of 1,041
Clavon Jones v. Captain Thoma
as 11-6772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAVON D. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN THOMAS, LIEUTENANT BRADLEY, WARDEN PADULA and others
Anthony Jones v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Prison Director, WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden, A. GRAVES, Grievance Cord and others
Angelo Ham v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, ANTHONY J. PADULA, JOHN J. BROOKS and others
Samuel Burt v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL BURT
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE L. EAGLETON and others
Stacy Howard v. Jon Ozmint
as 11-6459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STACY W. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, of S.C. Department of Corrections also known as John E. Ozmint, WARDEN WILLIE EAGLETON, AARON JOYNER, Major and others
Smalls v. Byars et al
as 9:2011cv00732
Plaintiff:
Leroy Kenneth Smalls
Defendant:
Bill Byars , Jon Ozmint , Robert Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Ozmint et al
as 6:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCray
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Omar Shadeed , Sgt Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Rochester v. David McCall
as 11-6328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID M. MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections
Christopher Owens v. Warden McCormick Correctional
as 11-6313
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DEMONT OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN MCCORMICK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Defendant:
JON OZMINT
Sheppard v. Forrest et al
as 4:2011cv00486
Plaintiff:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard
Defendant:
Robert Forrest , Tim Riley , Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
