Cases 11 - 20 of 1,041
Curtis King v. Officer Yancey Young
as 14-7226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS L. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
MALE OFFICER YOUNG
Defendant:
JON OZMINT, WARDEN CARTLEDGE, MAJOR LEWIS and others
THOMAS v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 0:2014cv03244
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Thomas
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint and PRISON DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Leggins et al
as 1:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Ms Leggins, David Tatarsky and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Thomas
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint, Medical Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Byars et al
as 6:2013cv03516
Plaintiff:
Henry W Martin, Jr
Defendant:
William R Byars, John R Pate, Arthur A Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Ford v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2013cv01618
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ford
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Wayne McCabe and E Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ford v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2013cv01618
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ford
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint , Wayne McCabe and E Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. Cartledge et al
as 1:2013cv01131
Plaintiff:
Trovon Aquarius Keith
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney, Major Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jody Ward v. Warden Lieber Correctional
as 13-6518
Petitioner - Appellant:
JODY LYNN WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT, Director SCDC
Isiah James, Jr. v. Warden Ridgeland Correctional
as 13-6309
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISIAH JAMES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
