Cases 81 - 90 of 1,049
Pelzer v. SCDC et al
as 2:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Pelzer
Defendant:
SCDC, Perry Correctional Institution, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelzer v. SCDC et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Pelzer
Defendant:
SCDC , Perry Correctional Institution , Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelzer v. SCDC et al
as 8:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Pelzer
Defendant:
SCDC, Perry Correctional Institution, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. MCI Mace et al
as 2:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
T. Terrell Bryan
Defendant:
MCI Mace, SCDC , U.S. Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Leatherwood v. Jon Ozmint
as 10-7761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID LEATHERWOOD, a/k/a Nico Coty Toscani
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, South Carolina Department of Corrections, in His Official and Individual Capacity, RAYMOND C. SWEET, USC Dept. of Neurosurgery, in His Official and Individual Capacity and JOHN SOLOMAN, SCDC Health Care Services, in His Official and Individual Capacity
Gregory Pencille v. Warden of Lee Correctional
as 10-7759
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY PENCILLE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON OZMINT
Stroman v. Ozmint
as 0:2010cv03240
Plaintiff:
Sammie J Stroman
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Anderson et al
as 8:2010cv03080
Plaintiff:
Kendall Green
Defendant:
D Anderson and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. State Of SC et al
as 1:2010cv03065
Petitioner:
Alex D Taylor
Respondent:
State Of SC and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Albert Page v. A. Padula
as 10-7674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT D. PAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. J. PADULA, AL TEDDER, Caseworker at Lee Correctional, MISS ROACH, Caseworker at the Kershaw Institution and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
