Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Hafen v. Rust Johnson
as 2:2019cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Lucile Rust Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Sagarin
as 2:2020cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Jill Sagarin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Dearden et al
as 2:2020cv00373
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Eric Dearden, Sandy Dearden, Kliff Bare and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Commodity Futures Trading Comm, et al v. Rust Rare Coin, et al
as 19-4100
Petitioner / Appellant:
TALLY JOHNSON and ANDREW JOHNSON
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and STATE OF UTAH DIVISION SECURITIES, through Attorney General, Sean D. Reyes
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE GUNDERSON RUST, GAYLEN DEAN RUST, RUSTY RARE COIN, a Utah corporation and others
Hafen v. Andreini et al
as 2:2020cv00374
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Peggy Hennings, Troy Piantes, Terri Andreini and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hafen v. Roche
as 2:2019cv00942
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Diane H. Roche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
AAAG California v. Kisana, et al
as 20-4034
Defendant / Appellant:
SPECIALIZED SALES AND LEASING, ABDUL KISANA and LUXURY AUTO GROUP
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Defendant:
JACK METCALF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AAAG CALIFORNIA
Hafen v. Muir
as 2:2019cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Jeanne Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hafen v. Percell et al
as 2:2019cv00899
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Vanessa Percell, Charlotte Ann Percell and Rosaria M. Percell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AAAG California v. Kisana, et al
as 20-4018
Defendant / Appellant:
SPECIALIZED SALES AND LEASING, ABDUL KISANA and LUXURY AUTO GROUP
Receiver:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Defendant:
JACK METCALF
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AAAG CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
