Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Muhammad et al v. Hardy Automotive LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
AL Malik Muhammad, Larry Williams and Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Hardy Automotive LLC, William Hardy and Alyssa Clark Hardy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Peterson v. Brooks et al
as 7:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Eric Dashon Peterson
Defendant:
Raven Brooks and Jonathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiley et al v. MedFirst Consulting Healthcare Staffing, LLC
as 2:2017cv01756
Plaintiff:
Jill Kiley , Marcus Payne , Alexander Berry and others
Defendant:
MedFirst Consulting Healthcare Staffing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Strange (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00945
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Strange (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Billups et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Phyllis Billups and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Albright et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Frank Albright and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipham v. Bankston et al
as 4:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jonathan William Lipham
Defendant:
Dewayne Bankston and Matthew Cooper
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Valeska et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Douglas Albert Valeska, Banks T. Smith, Rebecca Bensma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
