Cases 31 - 40 of 268
Jones v. Attorney General for the State of Ohio
as 3:2022cv00352
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Black
as 1:2022cv02155
Petitioner:
Shawn-Lamar Jones
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones et al
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dante Rice
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Warden/Captain Nick Fisher, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sullivan
as 3:2022cv02135
Petitioner:
Dashay Jones
Respondent:
Warden Dennis Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Foley
as 1:2022cv02033
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gilbert
as 2:2022cv03574
Plaintiff:
Virgil B. Jones
Defendant:
Eric Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris Sr. v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2022cv03461
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex, L. Shuler, R. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2022cv01571
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson Sr. v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Alfred Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Deputy Warden James Craig, Anita Edmonstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Matthews v. Butler County et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Estate of Cody Bohanan and Victoria Matthews
Defendant:
Butler County, Sheriff Richard K Jones, Medical Director Dr. Anthony Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
