Cases 41 - 50 of 54
DUPONT v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 1:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
AMBER DUPONT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC , BRAD ROSEBERRY, HEATHER JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE M JONES
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES v. LEWISTON, CITY OF et al
as 2:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
KEVIN A JONES
Defendant:
LEWISTON, CITY OF, LEWISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM WELSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. CAMDEN et al
as 2:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN, TOWN OF , GEOFF RUSHLAU and LINDSAY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HODGDON v. DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN A HODGDON
Defendant:
DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , SCOTT JONES and BEVERLY, OFC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHERBURNE v. ROMANO et al
as 2:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
HOPE E SHERBURNE
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROMANO, MICHAEL BENNETT, FRED JONES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. USA
as 2:2009cv00202
Petitioner:
RASHAUN JONES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MEGQUIER AND JONES INC v. WRIGHT-RYAN CONSTRUCTION INC et al
as 2:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
MEGQUIER AND JONES INC
Defendant:
WRIGHT-RYAN CONSTRUCTION INC , BERKLEY REGIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY , CCI INC and others
Counter_claimant:
WRIGHT-RYAN CONSTRUCTION INC
Counter_defendant:
MEGQUIER AND JONES INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MURPHY v. MAINE, STATE OF et al
as 1:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN MURPHY
Defendant:
MAINE, STATE OF, CHRISTINE FOSTER, KATHRYN L JONES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
