Cases 71 - 80 of 126
United States of America v. Lydick et al
as 8:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Angela Jones, Gerele E. Jones, Louisa L. Lydick and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Jones v. Hy-Vee et al
as 8:2014cv00092
Defendant:
Hy-Vee and NNW, LLC
Plaintiff:
Annette Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Jones v. Gage
as 8:2014cv00001
Respondent:
Brian Gage
Petitioner:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Houston
as 8:2013cv00337
Defendant:
Robert Houston
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 8:2013cv00275
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv03155
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Robinson v. Huerta et al
as 4:2013cv03130
Defendant:
A. Lester Haizlip, Brent Hart, Michael P. Huerta and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Officials et al
as 8:2013cv00067
Defendant:
Francis Britten, Scott Busboom, John's and Jane's Does and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hesser et al
as 4:2012cv03234
Defendant:
Mary L. Hesser, State Farm and Laura Tague
Plaintiff:
Troy L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Jones v. Astrue
as 8:2012cv00379
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
