Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Respondent:
Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. US Marshal Service et al
as 3:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Eric Day
Defendant:
US Marshal Service, Western Regional Jail, West Virginia Regional Jail Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. United States
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Sharp
Defendant:
Lt. C. Looney, Officer Specialist B. Jones, Correctional Officer Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jones v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Richard William Jones
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00175
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Jones
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. Severt et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thompson
Defendant:
Sean Severt, Officer Earl Leftwich, Patrolman Z. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Rae
as 5:2023cv00039
Petitioner:
VonTia Jones
Respondent:
Lovette Rae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
C.J. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
C. J.
Defendant:
David Jones, Matthew Currence and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Defendant:
Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
