Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Catalina Hluz Lopez et al v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Catalina Hluz Lopez and Jorge Lopez
Defendant:
Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Lopez v. Garland
as 22-1596
Petitioner:
JORGE LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jorge Lopez v. Signature Retail Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02834
Defendant:
Signature Retail Services, Inc. and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jorge Lopez v. Clougherty Packing, LLC
as 2:2020cv10728
Defendant:
Clougherty Packing, LLC, Clougherty Packing Co. and Farmer John Clougherty Packing
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Lopez Gallegos v. Saul
as 3:2020cv02156
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez Gallegos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Antonio Tapia Salazar v. William Barr
as 19-72900
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TAPIA SALAZAR, AKA Jorge Lopez Martinez, AKA Antonio Jose Tapia, AKA Jose Antonio Tapia Gutierrez
Jorge Lopez-Armenta v. William Barr
as 19-71909
Petitioner:
JORGE LOPEZ-ARMENTA, AKA Jorge Lopez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Carranza v. Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole et al
as 1:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lopez Carranza
Defendant:
Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole and Sandy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
