Cases 21 - 30 of 58
USA v. Jose Morales
as 16-16507
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. MORALES-COTTO et al
as 3:2015cv02677
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES-COTTO, JEANNETTE RIOS-ALVARADO and The Conyugal Partnership of Jose Luis Morales Cotto and Jeannette Rios Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales-Perez v. Stone Forestry Services Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Morales-Perez
Defendant:
Stone Forestry Services Inc, Juan Campos and Randy Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez
as 14-3135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Felipe Jesus Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as El Pipo, also known as Luis Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Morales, also known as Jorge Salas-Gonzales
United States v. Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez
as 14-3135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Felipe Jesus Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as El Pipo, also known as Luis Felipe Sabas-Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Morales, also known as Jorge Salas-Gonzales
Jose Morales v. Karen Cribbs, et al
as 14-16484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN CRIBBS, N. PANA, E. HENRY and others
Jose Morales v. Robert Horel
as 14-55663
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden
Morales v. The State of Florida et al
as 2:2014cv00215
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Morales
Respondent:
The State of Florida and Secretary of Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Morales v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-70615
:
In re: JOSE LUIS MORALES
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
J. WOLF, SUE RISENHOOVER, GREGORY DUNCAN, Dr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
