Cases 1 - 10 of 37
MESADIEU v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2023cv21376
Plaintiff:
GUILIO MESADIEU
Defendant:
TANGERLA MICHELLE THOMAS, JOHN ESMERADO, KENNETH J. GRISPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Eric Martinez-Lopez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1258
Petitioner:
ERIC JOSE MARTINEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Martinez
as 21-2481
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MARTINEZ
OZRAIL v. MARTINEZ-COLON et al
as 5:2021cv03443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED OZRAIL
Defendant:
JOSE MARTINEZ-COLON, MILLER DEDICATED SERVICES LLC, MILLER AUTO LEASING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv04336
Plaintiff:
DR. JOSE MARTINEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN GUY CIRILLO, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01360
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv20030
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff:
MARY MARTINEZ and JOSE MARTINEZ
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. USA
as 1:2019cv02025
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
