Cases 1 - 10 of 27
MATOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24779
Plaintiff:
JOSE MATOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matos-Peguero v. USA
as 3:2023cv01801
Petitioner:
Jose Matos-Peguero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Matos-Peguero v. Wertman
as 1:2023cv00435
Petitioner:
Jose Matos-Peguero
Respondent:
Warden Wertman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mattos Insurance, Inc. v. Matos Armando et al
as 0:2022cv62075
Plaintiff:
Mattos Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Matos Armando and Matos Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Mattos Insurance, Inc. v. Matos Armando et al
as 0:2022cv62071
Plaintiff:
Mattos Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Matos Armando and Matos Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Matos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv10686
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jose Matos
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MATOS RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66900
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MATOS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43256
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MATOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baucom et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12009
Plaintiff:
James Kelly, Jr., Jose Loja, Robert Koeth, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
