Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Edelson PC v. David Lira et al
as 2:2022cv08787
Respondent:
Erika Girardi, David Lira, Keith Griffin and others
Petitioner:
Edelson PC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joseph Ruigomez et al v. The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 2:2022cv08513
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruigomez, Kathleen Ruigomez and Jamie Ruigomez
Defendant:
The Dinardo Law Firm, P.C., Joseph Dinardo and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Ruigomez et al v. The DiNardo Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruigomez, Kathleen Ruigomez and Jamie Ruigomez
Defendant:
The DiNardo Law Firm, P.C., Joseph DiNardo and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Edelson PC v. Lira et al
as 3:2022cv03977
Defendant:
Erika Girardi, David Lira, Keith Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Edelson PC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff Funding Holding, LLC d/b/a LawCash v. Blue Ocean Partners LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Funding Holding, LLC d/b/a LawCash
Defendant:
Blue Ocean Partners LLC d/b/a Plaintiff Support Services, Dean Chase and Joseph DiNardo
DiNardo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, et al
as 3:2013cv03571
Plaintiff:
Joan DiNardo and Joseph DiNardo
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hersh & Hersh v. Morgan et al
as 2:2007cv00004
Plaintiff:
Hersh & Hersh
Defendant:
Justin R. Morgan, Justin R. Morgan, Robert E. Sanders and others
Counter Claimant:
Patrice Perlman, Patrice Perlman, Gess Mattingly & Atchison, P.S.C. and others
Cross Defendant:
O. Lee Hamilton, III, L. Landis Sexton, Joseph DiNardo and others
Cross Claimant:
Patrice Perlman, Patrice Perlman, Gess Mattingly & Atchison, P.S.C. and others
Counter Defendant:
Hersh & Hersh, Justin R. Morgan, Hersh & Hersh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
