Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Beville v. Smith
as 2:2016cv14486
Plaintiff:
Tammy Beville
Defendant:
Joseph E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Khan v. Bolduc et al
as 2:2016cv14050
Petitioner:
Roger Khan
Respondent:
John A. Bolduc and Joseph E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Piecuch et al
as 4:2014cv01652
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Smith
Defendant:
Michael Piecuch and Michael Hudock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Colton et al
as 2:2013cv14391
Plaintiff:
Bobby Glenn Washington
Defendant:
Bruce Colton, Diamond Litty, Joseph E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv14264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST HEALTH & BIOTECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05652
Plaintiff:
SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST HEALTH & BIOTECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., PETER S. KNIGHT, PATRICK G. LEPORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUVALL v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05109
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUVALL
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES INC. , PETER S. KNIGHT , PATRICK G. LEPORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garber v. Wygod et al
as 1:2011cv07549
Plaintiff:
H. Jordan Garber, MD
Defendant:
Martin J. Wygod, Wayne T. Gattinella, Kevin M. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wargula v. Wygod et al
as 1:2011cv06818
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wargula
Defendant:
Martin J. Wygod , Wayne T. Gattinella , Kevin M. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
IN RE WEBMD HEALTH CORP SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
as 1:2011cv06506
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gordon
Defendant:
Martin J. Wygod , Wayne T. Gattinella , Kevin M. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
