Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Keyton v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2023cv04947
Plaintiff:
Clinton M. Keyton
Defendant:
City of South Fulton and Detective Joseph King
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Beck et al v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2018cv01827
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Emerson Yabut, Magellan Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Paulette Beck and Gregory Beck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alphonzo Eleby v. Lee May, et al
as 16-16438
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALPHONZO ELEBY
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE MAY, in his official capacity as Interim Chief Executive Officer of Dekalb County and JOSEPH KING
Alphonzo Eleby v. Demetrius Kendrick
as 16-16320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALPHONZO ELEBY
Defendant - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS KENDRICK
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
JOSEPH KING and LEE MAY
Paparodis v. Dugan et al
as 8:2015cv02747
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Paparodis
Defendant:
April Dugan and Joseph King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eleby v. May et al
as 1:2014cv02092
Plaintiff:
Alphonzo Eleby
Defendant:
Lee May , Demetrius Kendrick, Patrick Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
ACEVEDO et al v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ACEVEDO , DAWON BALDWIN and TORELL MILLER
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JULIO GALINDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfield v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02342
Defendant:
City of New York, Undercover Officer John Doe 1, Undercover Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Drew Winfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas
Defendant:
The City of New York , Andres Mahecha, Joseph King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
