Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Love v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Joseph Love
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loving v. Douglas
as 2:2023cv12287
Petitioner:
Joseph Loving
Respondent:
MaComb, People of and Adam Douglas
United States of America v. Jackson
as 23-6281
Defendant:
AMAR SCOTT, YULANDER GREEN, JERRICK DENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JACKSON, Boosum and Boots
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Amar Scott (Smith)
as 22-3104
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amar Scott, AKA "A", John Simmons, Jerrick Denson, AKA "D" and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Dearick Smith, AKA "Ace", AKA "Lil D"
Zachary Love v. United States
as 21-3227
Petitioner:
Zachary Joseph Love
Respondent:
United States of America
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55198
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Scott (Hampton)
as 20-2986
Defendant:
Amar Scott, AKA "A", Marvin Simmons, AKA "Jr", AKA "Junior", Lamar Simmons, AKA Lil Daddy and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Russell Hampton, AKA "TJ"
Appellee:
United States of America
LOVE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94907
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOVE JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41328
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv36382
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
