Cases 11 - 20 of 214
Parker v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Charles Williams, Thiery Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00435
Defendant:
Stanley Terry, Kennard Dubose, Joseph McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02801
Plaintiff:
Harvey McDaniel
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Correctional Officer Dennis, Correctional Officer McKie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Horry County et al
as 4:2018cv02628
Petitioner:
Salvador Ware and Warden Joseph McFadden
Respondent:
Horry County and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McFadden v. Cowan Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03921
Plaintiff:
Joseph McFadden
Defendant:
Cowan Systems, LLC, Saul Salazar and C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Supreme Ackbar v. William R. Byers, Jr.
as 18-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN, LIEUTENANT EUGENE SKIPPER, LIEUTENANT COOPER and others
Defendant:
LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCDC and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Shannon McGee v. Joseph McFadden
as 18-6211
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON DEROWE MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN
Wright v. McFadden et al
as 5:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Wright
Defendant:
Joseph McFadden and William Brightharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. McFadden
as 5:2018cv00243
Petitioner:
Jacoby G Fields
Respondent:
Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. McFadden et al
as 5:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Wright
Defendant:
Joseph McFadden, Karl Von Mutius and Joseph Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
