Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Joseph Cuviello v. City of Belmont, et al
as 23-16135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BELMONT, AFSHIN OSKOUI, City of Belmont City Manager and BRIGITTE SHEARER, City of Belmont Parks and Recreation Director
Cuviello v. City of Belmont et al
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Joseph P, Cuviello and Joseph Patrick Cuviello
Defendant:
City of Belmont, Afshin Oskoui and Brigitte Shearer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Cuviello, I v. Feld Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 14-16793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO, I
Defendant - Appellee:
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., DBA Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey Circus, MIKE STUART, Ringling Bros Director of Circus Operations, DAVID BAILEY, Ringling Bros Blue Unit Assistant General Manager and others
Deniz Bolbol, et al v. Feld Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 13-15629
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DENIZ BOLBOL and JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO, I
Defendant - Appellant:
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., DBA Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey Circus
Defendant:
JAMES DENNIS, Ringling Brothers General Manager and MATTHEW GILLET, Ringling Brothers Circus Operations Manager
Deniz Bolbol, et al v. Feld Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 13-15484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENIZ BOLBOL and JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO, I
Defendant - Appellee:
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., DBA Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey Circus, JAMES DENNIS, Ringling Brothers General Manager and MATTHEW GILLET, Ringling Brothers Circus Operations Manager
Deniz Bolbol, et al v. Feld Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 12-16508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENIZ BOLBOL and JOSEPH PATRICK CUVIELLO, I
Defendant - Appellee:
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., DBA Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey Circus, JAMES DENNIS, Ringling Brothers General Manager and MATTHEW GILLET, Ringling Brothers Circus Operations Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
