Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Meyer, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL KELLY MEYER
Plaintiff:
SAMS ANTICS INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, STATE OF NEBRASKA, MIKE HILGERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and others
Medina v. United States Department of Treasury, et al
as 24-8000
Plaintiff:
VANESSA MEDINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America and others
Colleen Huber v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLLEEN HUBER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, TWITTER, INC. and JACK DORSEY, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Twitter and in his individual capacity
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 22-10049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission, (HSSC)
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
The Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. et al v. Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America et al
as 1:2021xc00226
Plaintiff:
The Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., The Associated General Contractors of Texas, Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch and TEXO, The Construction Association
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Office of Management and Budget and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
The Associated General Contractors of America Inc et al v. Joseph R Biden et al
as 4:2021cv01344
Plaintiff:
The Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., The Associated General Contractors of Texas, Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch, TEXO, The Construction Association and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, The United States of America, Office of Management and Budget and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 21-4088
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
State of Texas et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA,, United States Department of Health and Human Services, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE and others
Petitioner:
Representative Chip Roy
Amicus Curiae:
Representative Michael Burgess, Representative Dan Crenshaw, Representative Jake Ellzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
In re: Joy Garner, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 21-70925
Not Classified By Court:
EVAN GLASCO, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, In re: JOY GARNER and others
Petitioner:
JOY GARNER, individually and on behalf of The Control Group, MICHAEL HARRIS, EVAN GLASCO, individually and as parent of F.G. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
