Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dowell v. National Security Agency and Archives et al
as 6:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Dowell
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Archives, Austin Loyd, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Christmas v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Rayshawn J. Christmas
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., John Bel Edwards, James M LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Biden
as 6:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Larry Coleman Hicks
Defendant:
U.S. President Joseph R Biden, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. USA
as 23-40289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alton C. Jordan
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Congress, State of Texas and others
McCurry v. USA
as 23-40287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sylvester McCurry
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States Congress and others
Dixon v. Biden et al
as 6:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
President Joseph R. Biden, State Of Texas, Skyview Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Shelby
as 23-20108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alex Adams
Defendant / Appellee:
Tammy Shelby, Central Grievance Office, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Mike Piasiensk, Inspector General and others
Adams v. Shelby et al
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Tammy Shelby, Michael Carvajal, Mike Piasiensk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
