Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06051
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith and Joseph J. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv06342
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vail v. O'Gorman et al
as 9:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Joseph Bellnier, Scott Kelly, James O'Gorman and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Vail and Timothy Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siguencia et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12044
Plaintiff:
Mark Slatnick, Jaime Sosa, Derek Stroke and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Vail v. O'Gorman et al
as 6:2018cv06601
Defendant:
Joseph Bellnier, Scott Kelly, Amber Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv03443
Defendant:
Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Local 2230 and Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC doing business as Brookhaven National Laboratory
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Smith v. Bell
as 9:2018cv00160
Petitioner:
Joseph Smith
Respondent:
Earl Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. The City of Albany et al
as 1:2017cv01098
Plaintiff:
Domonec Tucker
Defendant:
The City of Albany and Joseph Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2017cv00639
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith and Ronald Raiser
Defendant:
City of Buffalo , Shawn Adams , Joe Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
