Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Melvin Tyler v. Robert Schollmeyer, et al
as 20-1028
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Joseph Spillane, Robert Schollmeyer, Mary R. Russell and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melvin Leroy Tyler, State of Missouri, by Melvin Leroy Tyler
Rady Williams v. Mark Becker, et al
as 19-11639
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH SPILLANE and MARK P. BECKER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RADY WILLIAMS
Williams v. Georgia State University et al
as 1:2018cv05348
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Georgia State University President Mark P. Becker and Georgia State University Chief Joseph Spillane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017cv00530
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017mi00004
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Ruch v. Michelle McKenzie, et al
as 16-16175
Appellant:
ALAN GRUEN, JAMES WHITMIRE, JOSEPH SPILLANE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RUCH
John Ruch v. Michelle McKenzie, et al
as 16-16175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN RUCH
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHELLE MCKENZIE, ALAN GRUEN, BROWN and others
Toole v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2016cv02909
Plaintiff:
Corey Toole
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Rodney Bryant, Joseph Spillane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruch v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv03296
Plaintiff:
John Ruch
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Michelle McKenzie, Alan Gruen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spillane v. Dhillon et al
as 1:2010cv03143
Defendant:
Maha Singh Dhillon and Kuldeep Singh
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spillane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
