Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Petitioner:
Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, Joseph Cecile and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, in his Official Capcity as Superintendent of the New York State Police, Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County and others
Petitioner:
Gerard Gardner
Antonyuk et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Kevin P. Bruen, Judge Doran J. Matthew and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinto v. Stanzione et al
as 1:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Joseph Stanzione, Terry Wilhelm, Offices of Greene County Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Pinto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pinto v. Stanzione et al
as 7:2020cv06284
Plaintiff:
PETER PINTO
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOSEPH STANZIONE
Defendant:
GREENE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, CATSKILL SHERIFF DEPT., OFFICE OF GREENE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Pittman v. Low et al
as 1:2016cv01464
Plaintiff:
Henry E. Pittman
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Low, Joseph Stanzione, John Lyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley v. Seely et al
as 1:2015cv01345
Plaintiff:
James S. Hartley, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregory R. Seely, Robert LaBuff, Joseph Stanzione and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis & Stanzione v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00863
Plaintiff:
Lewis & Stanzione
Defendant:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Lewis & Stanzione and Joseph Stanzione
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Joseph Stanzione and Lewis & Stanzione
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
