Cases 81 - 90 of 263
EDDINGS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
KWAME T. EDDINGS
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, RICHARD BOWER and SEAN M. SAMSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darrington v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01281
Petitioner:
Sean Darrington
Respondent:
Kevin Ransom, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lundy v. Brittain et al
as 1:2021cv01259
Petitioner:
Steven Love Lundy
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTINEZ v. SALAMON et al
as 1:2021cv00181
Petitioner:
LOUIS MARTINEZ
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POPLAWSKI v. VILARINO et al
as 2:2021cv03084
Defendant:
JAYMMIE M. VILARINO, J.M. POPLAWSKI, HON. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. POPLAWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Kauffman et al
as 2:2021cv03070
Petitioner:
GREGORY DUNBAR
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN, JOSH SHAPIRO and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03058
Plaintiff:
ZUNIR WALKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv03056
Plaintiff:
DA'SEAN FORD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN, COMMISSIONER CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANTASSEL v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Petitioner:
JEREMIAH LYLE VANTASSEL
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
